The Moon Shall Be Turned Into Blood

(Astronomic Aspects in Dating the Life of Christ)

Sergei Golovin, Ph.D., D.Min.

Christian Center for Science and Apologetics (Ukraine)

www.scienceandapologetics.org

Most people, when asked about the dates of Christ’s birth and death, will not hesitate to answer that Jesus of Nazareth was born between two eras and His birth actually is the beginning of the Current (Christian) Era. At the age of thirty He began His ministry which lasted fààor three years. After that He was crucified at the age of thirty-three, that is in 33 A.D.

However, the only precise chronological marker in the Gospels themselves is the beginning of John the Baptist’s ministry. “In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar—when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, Herod tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and Traconitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abileneduring the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John son of Zechariah in the desert” (Lk. 3:1-2, NIV). This time (the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius) corresponds to 28-29 A.D., but there are no clear indications how long the ministry of John the Baptist continued until the Lord’s baptism and how long the subsequent earthly ministry of our Lord lasted. The events described by the Synoptics (Matthew, Mark, Luke) could all be placed within one year, whereas John more or less clearly describes three years of the ministry.

Also, the Scripture does not contain any explicit references to Jesus’ age. On the one hand, Luke tells us that “Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry” (Lk. 3:23), but there is no telling how precise that “about” was. On the other hand, some contemporaries viewed Christ as “not yet fifty years old” (John 8:57). So how old was Jesus when Pilate gave Him over to be crucified? In order to answer this question, one has to know the dates of His birth and crucifixion.

The chronology that became common nowadays – the one starting from the Birth of Christ – is the least helpful when one tries to calculate the date of the event itself. This chronology was introduced in 525 A.D. at the suggestion of Dionysius Exiguous – a Roman scholastic of Scythian origin. He calculated that Christ was born in 754 AUC (ab urbe condita - "from the founding of the city", i.e. after the founding of Rome). This date became the new reference point for history. But because Dionysius had access only to a limited amount of historical data, the margin of error in his calculation was about 10%. Specifically, Dionysius missed the four years when Augustus reigned under the name of Octavian. Historically, Jesus was born before the death of Herod (most scholars date it by March of 4 B.C.). Therefore most probably it occurred in 5 B.C. since according to Josephus, the census mentioned by Luke took place a year before the king’s death. This date supports the interpretation according to which the Star of Bethlehem was a comet seen for more than 70 days in the constellation of Capricorn in the spring of 5 B.C. [1].

The date of the Crucifixion is more clear, but less certain. All the Evangelists agree that it happened under the jurisdiction of Pontius Pilate, governor of Judea, i.e. between 26 and 36 A.D. During those years, the 14th day of the month Nissan on which the paschal lambs had to be sacrificed in preparation for the great holiday (the 15th of Nissan; days began at sunset) fell on a Friday twice: in A.D. 30 and A.D. 33. [2]. So we know the day of the Crucifixion, but the year has to be either A.D. 30 and A.D. 33. — one has to make a choice.

The earlier date (A.D. 30) is supported by the tradition of a 33 years old Jesus (even in that case He is 34 years old) and the tradition that goes back to the 3rd century A. D. (Origen, Julius Africanus), that the darkness covering the earth from noon till 3 pm (Mt. 27:45; Mk. 15:33; Lk. 23:44) was the solar eclipse described by Phlegon in his thirteenth book of Olympiads. Phlegon’s work itself did not survive, but the fragment with a description of an eclipse is preserved in a number of secondary sources, i.e. by Jerome: “Indeed Phlegon, who is an excellent calculator of Olympiads, also writes about these things, writing thus in his thirteenth book: In the fourth year, however, of olympiad 202, an eclipse of the sun happened, greater and more excellent than any that had happened before it; at the sixth hour, day turned into dark night, so that the stars were seen in the sky, and an earthquake in Bithynia toppled many buildings of the city of Nicaea” [3].   

Fig. 1. The moon passing through the shadow of the earth’s atmosphere during the partial lunar eclipse on April 3, 33 A.D.

But the solar eclipse that, according to Phlegon, took place in the fourth year of the 202nd Olympiad (most probably it is the full solar eclipse on 24 November 29 A.D.) and the devastating earthquake that happened in the same year (but not necessarily at the same time) in Bithynia have nothing to do with the darkness that came during Christ’s Crucifixion. First of all, darkness during solar eclipses lasts only a few minutes. Secondly, only a new moon can eclipse the sun – when the moon passes between the sun and the earth. But the Passover is celebrated during a full moon (first one after the spring equinox), when the sun and the moon are situated on the opposite sides of the earth. No matter how we try to explain the supernatural darkness during the Crucifixion by natural phenomena (whether the atmosphere became less transparent or the clouds became thicker or even the sun was eclipsed by some unknown space object [4]), those explanations will remain speculations. Regardless, this sign could not be a regular solar eclipse.

But it does not mean that we have no astronomical indicators for this event. When the Apostle Peter in his sermon on the Day of Pentecost cites a list of the fulfilled signs of the “day of the Lord” predicted by Joel, the words “The sun will be turned to darkness and the moon to blood” (Joel 2:31; Acts 2:20) do not seem to puzzle the audience at all. Although the Gospels do not mention the moon turning into blood, Luke, as he cites the words of the Apostle in the Book of Acts, refers to this fact as to common knowledge. This reference was so obvious for early readers that the later parabiblical writers – from the apocryphal Gospel of Nicodemus to the pseudo-historical correspondence of Pilate with Herod – never fail to mention a blood-colored moon [5].

“Blood-colored moon” is a well-known phenomenon observed during lunar eclipses (unlike the solar ones, lunar eclipses happen when the moon is full) when the moon is not fully covered by the shadow of the earth, but is fully covered by the shadow of the earth’s atmosphere. In such cases the surface of the moon is illuminated only by the light that has gone through the earth’s atmosphere tangentially. The shorter waves of the visible spectrum (light blue, blue, green, and even yellow ones) are dispersed and absorbed in the atmosphere. As the result, only the longest, dark-red rays reach the moon’s surface. A similar effect can be observed on the earth when the sun is setting behind clouds on the horizon and only dark red rays fall on an object.

According to the catalogue of the lunar eclipses in the first century A.D. [6], in A.D. 30 there were no lunar eclipses till the end of May, whereas in A.D.33 a partial lunar eclipse with the magnitude 0.5764 happened when the moon rose at the night of April 3 – that was exactly the first full moon after the spring equinox, i.e. on the Passover, as Nissan 15 began. The eclipse took place from 16:12:50 to 19:02:56 on the universal time, that is from about 6 pm to 9 pm according to the local time in the Middle East – the very period called the first watch of the night. Fig. 1 shows how the moon passed through the shadow of the earth’s atmosphere on that day which gave the moon dark-red color.

If we accept this suggestion, then Peter, as he mentions in the Pentecostal sermon (recorded by Luke in Acts 2) the moon’s “turning into blood,” refers to the event that had been witnessed by all the audience. This supports the conclusion that the Crucifixion should be dated by the 14th of Nissan (April 3) 33 A.D. At that time Jesus was, most probably, 37 years old.   

Bibliography

1. Åôèìîâ Ñ.Þ. Âèôëååìñêàÿ çâåçäà. – Ñèìôåðîïîëü: ÄÈÀÉÏÈ, 2009. – 56 ñ.
2. Hebrew Calendar. – http://www.cgsf.org/dbeattie/calendar/?roman=33 3. Èåðîíèì Áëàæåííûé. Èçëîæåíèå õðîíèêè Åâñåâèÿ Êåñàðèéñêîãî, 202 (29/32). Öèò. ïî Äåðåâåíñêèé Á.Ã. Èèñóñ Õðèñòîñ â äîêóìåíòàõ èñòîðèè. – Ñïá: Àëåòåéÿ, 2001. – Ñ.29.
4. Exact Date of Christ's Crucifixion – http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/2007/04/exact-date-of-christs-crucifixion.html
5. Ñì. Äåðåâåíñêèé Á.Ã. Èèñóñ Õðèñòîñ â äîêóìåíòàõ èñòîðèè. – Ñïá: Àëåòåéÿ, 2001. – 430 ñ.
6. List of 1st century lunar eclipses. – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_1st_century_lunar_eclipses#cite_note-0#cite_note-0